Daniel Ruth aka “LaRouche La Ruth”
Daniel Ruth is Lyndon LaRouche with Elaine Silvestrini?
Daniel Ruth – is he the person known as Lyndon LaRouche? See the photographic evidence at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7894913@N08/2898419047/
http://picasaweb.google.com/rexcurrydotnet/GetRuthLess#5251477392223721010
Has anyone ever seen those two together?
http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-lyndon-larouche.jpg
Has the mystery of Ruth’s hybrid toupee / combover question been solved? (Ruth once told a critic that Ruth would let the critic find out if Ruth has a hybrid toupee/combover if the critic paid Ruth $5000 -Ruth knew that if the price was high then the critic would pass on Ruth’s toupee/combover question).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BssWWZ3XEe4
Ruth and Elaine Silvestrini Mussolini (of the Tampa Tribune) believe that the purpose of government is to provide service, and the purpose of the media is to provide vaseline.
http://rexcurry.net/saying-the-pledge-of-allegiance-pictures.html
Think of the Tampa Tribune as a torture conspiracy (as its readers think of
it; both of them). After Ruth’s previous loss to Dr. Curry, the response
against Ruth from the general public was so great that Ruth said he was
labeled a “Dork, anti-free market statist $#@%!&@, Dummkopf, liberal, daffy,
dolt, stupid, dunce and, oh by the way, socialist.”
Ruth’s use of “socialist” is telling in that Ruth covers up for the National
Socialist German Workers Party and its deadly dogma. The neo-nationalist
Ruth has probably never written the actual name of the group “National
Socialist German Workers Party” in the Tribune (check it yourself).
On the Tribune’s flag fetishism, Ruth and Silvestrini have been influenced
by America’s most notorious National Socialists, Francis Bellamy and Edward
Bellamy. Ruth’s economic ignorance equals or exceeds Edward Bellamy’s.
Silvestrini and Ruth add to the public perception of their profession as
“news nazis.”
Ruth and Silvestrini are disturbingly silent about the Bellamys and their
bigotry, xenophobia, militarism, robotic chanting for children, and
authoritarian socialism (and their influence upon German National Socialism,
its dogma, symbols and rituals). Bellamy dogma led to segregation imposed by
law, and racism taught as official policy. And what about the jingoism,
zealotry and fanaticism? The Ruth/Silvestrini silence becomes deafening
about the related hate-mongering, persecution, violence, and even lynchings
inspired by the Bellamys and their socialist religion. It becomes scarier in
that Ruth refers to himself as the “Book of Ruth.”
Good Grief, Lyndon LaRouche was not as delusional as Ruth is. Ruth writes
flippantly about torture. LaRouche La Ruth’s insane clown posse act is like
something out of “Apocalypse Now” meets “A Clockwork Orange.”
And what about Elaine “Mussolini” Silvestrini? Many people forget that the
Italian cohort of German National Socialism developed as a popular
“journalist” among socialists and socialist newpapers. Silvestrini Mussolini
is a scary reminder.
Would Ruth and Silvestrini like to “restore the Pledge” to
preserve its historic heritage: Its earlier salute gesture?
For many years, the near-sighted loopy leprechaun (Ruth) has flittered about
the fringes of political life in the Tampa Bay area as a sort of scary class
clown, in the “special” section, hoping that his kindergarten name-calling
would make his teachers give up and leave him alone.
Ruth, a Dominick Dunne wannabe, is the Rump-hole of the Insanely. Ruth’s
self-defecating remarks are asinine. Ruth’s flatulence worsens whenever Ruth
rubs his brain cells together. Both of them.
The Tribune is also a torture conspiracy for the victims/survivors of
crimes. If victims re-live crime trauma in multiple trials then they can
blame Ruth, Silvestrini and people who think as they do. Ruth and
Silvestrini stupidly cheer for the ballooning federal government and for
victims of gruesome crimes to endure multiple trials that are costly and
time-consuming. They are a morbid circus of “news” clowns in a clockwork
orange. If it were up to Ruth, Silvestrini and their ilk then the federal
and state government would take turns re-trying the same “newsy” cases
annually so that Ruth and Silvestrini would have something about which to
babble incoherently.
It is no wonder that Silvestrini’s columns never state any qualifications
she has to write articles about legal topics (or any topics). Only
Silvestrini’s phone number and email address were given with no biographical
or background information (nor any link to such information). Compared to
Dr. Curry’s illustrious career, Silvestrini’s name is longer than her career
highlights. There is a complete lack of disclosure of whether Silvestrini
has any licensing or educational achievement that qualifies her to write on
such a topic, how she was selected, nor how much she was paid to write the
piece (It might embarrass her if they printed what she was paid. She is no
where near being paid $100 per hour). Silvestrini learned to write in
government schools on Planet Zircon 9. She is the Touch-hole of the
Insanely.
As a career move, Silvestrini and Ruth should not become lawyers. Their
“journalism” might cause some people to wonder if they are competent even to
write about legal issues, or to write at all about anything. If they are
considering a job change then here is a Memo to Silvestrini and Ruth: Don’t
start packing your bags.
Silvestrini and Ruth remain unable or unwilling to state the simple issue:
The Pledge of Allegiance (and its author) was the origin of the salute of
the National Socialist German Workers Party and influenced its symbols and
rituals. They are deniers and historical revisionists. They play blind to
its effect on the enormous growth of government today.
http://rexcurry.net/USA-pledge-of-allegiance-rexcurrydotnet.jpg
Are Tribune writers dense or does intellectual dishonesty and a lack of
integrity make them unwilling to provide simple accurate reporting?
On the other hand, Elaine Silvestrini has strange tastes in what she does
write about. In a recent article, Silvestrini’s interests were drawn to
“adults only” web pages about swastika and flag fetishism and she was
attracted to a body-building picture of Arnold Schwarzenegger and a picture
of an American flag with swastikas in place of stars. On 7-3-07, Silvestrini
wrote about a man who sells virtual sex toys, including characters on screen
that can be animated into a variety of sexual positions (she seems to have
researched that one thoroughly); Silvestrini has written repeatedly about
what Silvestrini calls a “high-profile drug, sex and torture case.”
Silvestrini and Ruth have paid a lot of attention to Max Hardcore and his
pornography (and LaRuth makes childish jokes about it, of course).
It is a reminder of the old adage: “To a socialist/statist there is no
bigger phallic symbol than a flag pole.”
If you read newspapers for years then you will see all manner of ditzoid
craziness that slops its way over the journalistic gunwales -claims of UFO
abductions, the conspiracy theorists, Nazi cabals, and people who believe
monkeys are taking over the world.
And those are just some of the serious news stories. There are some
newspaper writers, too, who are really weird. Take Silvestrini and Ruth.
Please, take them.
For all the black helicopter sightings and strange arguments that Shecky
Green and the Jewish lobby control the government and Y2K means the end of
the world, Silvestrini Mussolini and LaRouche La Ruth are the most twistedly
evasive.
The Felliniesque Fidel Castros never addressed any of the original issues.
For example, why is the federal government growing so large, taking over
criminal law nationwide, and becoming involved in what in the past would
have been state level cases? Silvestrini – a “newspaper” writer – weighed
in with one long sputtering bluster against historical reality. Loony Ruth
did his mental blank-out. The Karl Marxs of the Twilight Zone responded with
a bunch of journalistic babble.
Silvestrini and Ruth are the most visible local disciples of the Tampa
Tribune, which ought to have their embarrassed fellow travelers donning
Groucho Marx disguises around the office and about town.
Recently when Silvestrini wrote again about “high-profile drugs, sex and
torture,” Silvestrini mentioned Dr. Curry, and his appellate work as an
attorney for a defendant in whom Silvestrini has taken an ongoing interest.
Silvestrini wrote about two critics of Curry’s work and then she quoted
Curry’s response, “You can write that I have challenged them to a public
debate of their claims and that the next step is to select a time and place
for doing so, if they think they are up to it.”
http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html
Silvestrini’s quote was a public debate challenge by Dr. Curry to Charles
Rose, a professor at Stetson Law School, and the dare was printed in the
Tampa Tribune Newspaper in September 2008. A law school would be an ideal
place for an educational debate and it would be easy for Charles Rose to
rise up to the challenge. As expected, Charles Rose apparently did not
think he was up to it as Charles Rose has not selected a time or place in
response to Dr. Curry’s public debate challenge.
Even after Elaine Silvestrini drafted the debate challenge to Charles Rose
in the newspaper, there was no response from Rose that Silvestrini printed
in the article. It remains another media debate challenge victory for Dr.
Curry over Charles Rose.
