Pledge of Allegiance, Francis Bellamy, Swastikas, Edward Bellamy, Daniel Ruth, Elaine Silvestrini, Tampa Tribune exposed & defeated (again!)

Daniel Ruth aka “LaRouche La Ruth”

Daniel Ruth – is he the person known as Lyndon LaRouche? See the

photographic evidence at

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7894913@N08/2898419047/

http://picasaweb.google.com/rexcurrydotnet/GetRuthLess#5251477392223721010

Has anyone ever seen those two together?

http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-lyndon-larouche.jpg

Has the mystery of Ruth’s hybrid toupee / combover question been solved?

(Ruth once told a critic that Ruth would let the critic find out if Ruth has

a hybrid toupee/combover if the critic paid Ruth $5000 -Ruth knew that if

the price was high then the critic would pass on Ruth’s toupee/combover

question). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BssWWZ3XEe4

Ruth and Elaine Silvestrini Mussolini (of the Tampa Tribune) believe that

the purpose of government is to

provide service, and the purpose of the media is to provide vaseline.

http://rexcurry.net/saying-the-pledge-of-allegiance-pictures.html

Think of the Tampa Tribune as a torture conspiracy (as its readers think of

it; both of them). After Ruth’s previous loss to Dr. Curry, the response

against Ruth from the general public was so great that Ruth said he was

labeled a “Dork, anti-free market statist $#@%!&@, Dummkopf, liberal, daffy,

dolt, stupid, dunce and, oh by the way, socialist.”

http://rexcurry.net/ruth.html

Ruth’s use of “socialist” is telling in that Ruth covers up for the National

Socialist German Workers Party and its deadly dogma. The neo-nationalist

Ruth has probably never written the actual name of the group “National

Socialist German Workers Party” in the Tribune (check it yourself).

On the Tribune’s flag fetishism, Ruth and Silvestrini have been influenced

by America’s most notorious National Socialists, Francis Bellamy and Edward

Bellamy. Ruth’s economic ignorance equals or exceeds Edward Bellamy’s.

Silvestrini and Ruth add to the public perception of their profession as

“news nazis.”

Ruth and Silvestrini are disturbingly silent about the Bellamys and their

bigotry, xenophobia, militarism, robotic chanting for children, and

authoritarian socialism (and their influence upon German National Socialism,

its dogma, symbols and rituals). Bellamy dogma led to segregation imposed by

law, and racism taught as official policy. And what about the jingoism,

zealotry and fanaticism? The Ruth/Silvestrini silence becomes deafening

about the related hate-mongering, persecution, violence, and even lynchings

inspired by the Bellamys and their socialist religion. It becomes scarier in

that Ruth refers to himself as the “Book of Ruth.”

Good Grief, Lyndon LaRouche was not as delusional as Ruth is. Ruth writes

flippantly about torture. LaRouche La Ruth’s insane clown posse act is like

something out of “Apocalypse Now” meets “A Clockwork Orange.”

And what about Elaine “Mussolini” Silvestrini? Many people forget that the

Italian cohort of German National Socialism developed as a popular

“journalist” among socialists and socialist newpapers. Silvestrini Mussolini

is a scary reminder.

Would Ruth and Silvestrini like to “restore the Pledge” to

preserve its historic heritage: Its earlier salute gesture?

For many years, the near-sighted loopy leprechaun (Ruth) has flittered about

the fringes of political life in the Tampa Bay area as a sort of scary class

clown, in the “special” section, hoping that his kindergarten name-calling

would make his teachers give up and leave him alone.

Ruth, a Dominick Dunne wannabe, is the Rump-hole of the Insanely. Ruth’s

self-defecating remarks are asinine. Ruth’s flatulence worsens whenever Ruth

rubs his brain cells together. Both of them.

The Tribune is also a torture conspiracy for the victims/survivors of

crimes. If victims re-live crime trauma in multiple trials then they can

blame Ruth, Silvestrini and people who think as they do. Ruth and

Silvestrini stupidly cheer for the ballooning federal government and for

victims of gruesome crimes to endure multiple trials that are costly and

time-consuming. They are a morbid circus of “news” clowns in a clockwork

orange. If it were up to Ruth, Silvestrini and their ilk then the federal

and state government would take turns re-trying the same “newsy” cases

annually so that Ruth and Silvestrini would have something about which to

babble incoherently.

It is no wonder that Silvestrini’s columns never state any qualifications

she has to write articles about legal topics (or any topics). Only

Silvestrini’s phone number and email address were given with no biographical

or background information (nor any link to such information). Compared to

Dr. Curry’s illustrious career, Silvestrini’s name is longer than her career

highlights. There is a complete lack of disclosure of whether Silvestrini

has any licensing or educational achievement that qualifies her to write on

such a topic, how she was selected, nor how much she was paid to write the

piece (It might embarrass her if they printed what she was paid. She is no

where near being paid $100 per hour). Silvestrini learned to write in

government schools on Planet Zircon 9. She is the Touch-hole of the

Insanely.

As a career move, Silvestrini and Ruth should not become lawyers. Their

“journalism” might cause some people to wonder if they are competent even to

write about legal issues, or to write at all about anything. If they are

considering a job change then here is a Memo to Silvestrini and Ruth: Don’t

start packing your bags.

Silvestrini and Ruth remain unable or unwilling to state the simple issue:

The Pledge of Allegiance (and its author) was the origin of the salute of

the National Socialist German Workers Party and influenced its symbols and

rituals. They are deniers and historical revisionists. They play blind to

its effect on the enormous growth of government today.

http://rexcurry.net/USA-pledge-of-allegiance-rexcurrydotnet.jpg

Are Tribune writers dense or does intellectual dishonesty and a lack of

integrity make them unwilling to provide simple accurate reporting?

On the other hand, Elaine Silvestrini has strange tastes in what she does

write about. In a recent article, Silvestrini’s interests were drawn to

“adults only” web pages about swastika and flag fetishism and she was

attracted to a body-building picture of Arnold Schwarzenegger and a picture

of an American flag with swastikas in place of stars. On 7-3-07, Silvestrini

wrote about a man who sells virtual sex toys, including characters on screen

that can be animated into a variety of sexual positions (she seems to have

researched that one thoroughly); Silvestrini has written repeatedly about

what Silvestrini calls a “high-profile drug, sex and torture case.”

Silvestrini and Ruth have paid a lot of attention to Max Hardcore and his

pornography (and LaRuth makes childish jokes about it, of course).

It is a reminder of the old adage: “To a socialist/statist there is no

bigger phallic symbol than a flag pole.”

If you read newspapers for years then you will see all manner of ditzoid

craziness that slops its way over the journalistic gunwales -claims of UFO

abductions, the conspiracy theorists, Nazi cabals, and people who believe

monkeys are taking over the world.

And those are just some of the serious news stories. There are some

newspaper writers, too, who are really weird. Take Silvestrini and Ruth.

Please, take them.

For all the black helicopter sightings and strange arguments that Shecky

Green and the Jewish lobby control the government and Y2K means the end of

the world, Silvestrini Mussolini and LaRouche La Ruth are the most twistedly

evasive.

The Felliniesque Fidel Castros never addressed any of the original issues.

For example, why is the federal government growing so large, taking over

criminal law nationwide, and becoming involved in what in the past would

have been state level cases? Silvestrini – a “newspaper” writer – weighed

in with one long sputtering bluster against historical reality. Loony Ruth

did his mental blank-out. The Karl Marxs of the Twilight Zone responded with

a bunch of journalistic babble.

Silvestrini and Ruth are the most visible local disciples of the Tampa

Tribune, which ought to have their embarrassed fellow travelers donning

Groucho Marx disguises around the office and about town.

Recently when Silvestrini wrote again about “high-profile drugs, sex and

torture,” Silvestrini mentioned Dr. Curry, and his appellate work as an

attorney for a defendant in whom Silvestrini has taken an ongoing interest.

Silvestrini wrote about two critics of Curry’s work and then she quoted

Curry’s response, “You can write that I have challenged them to a public

debate of their claims and that the next step is to select a time and place

for doing so, if they think they are up to it.”

http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html

Silvestrini’s quote was a public debate challenge by Dr. Curry to Charles

Rose, a professor at Stetson Law School, and the dare was printed in the

Tampa Tribune Newspaper in September 2008. A law school would be an ideal

place for an educational debate and it would be easy for Charles Rose to

rise up to the challenge. As expected, Charles Rose apparently did not

think he was up to it as Charles Rose has not selected a time or place in

response to Dr. Curry’s public debate challenge.

Even after Elaine Silvestrini drafted the debate challenge to Charles Rose

in the newspaper, there was no response from Rose that Silvestrini printed

in the article. It remains another media debate challenge victory for Dr.

Curry over Charles Rose.